Indian Defence Attaché’s Remark on Operation Sindoor Sparks Debate: Here’s What Happened
A recent remark by Captain Shiv Kumar, India’s Defence Attaché to Indonesia, regarding Operation Sindoor, sparked political and media uproar before being officially clarified by the Indian government.
🔍 What Was Said?
At a seminar in Jakarta, Captain Shiv Kumar mentioned that India lost some aircraft during the initial phase of Operation Sindoor. He attributed this to political instructions not to target Pakistani air defences or military bases during the first wave of strikes. Only after these early setbacks were tactics adjusted, including the use of BrahMos missiles and strikes on enemy air defences.
⚠️ Political Backlash
His statement drew swift reactions from opposition parties like the Congress, who accused the government of hiding crucial information from the public. Leaders such as Jairam Ramesh and Pawan Khera demanded accountability, claiming the statement reflected poorly on national security decision-making.
🛡️ Government Clarification
On June 29, the Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a statement clarifying that Captain Shiv Kumar’s comments were taken out of context. The embassy emphasized that he was highlighting how Indian armed forces operate under civilian leadership, which ensures democratic oversight. The statement reaffirmed that Operation Sindoor was a measured, non-escalatory strike targeting terrorist infrastructure, not military assets.
✅ Summary
- The Defence Attaché’s comments stirred political debate.
- The government clarified the intent and facts behind the operation.
- Operation Sindoor remains a symbol of India’s strategic restraint and military discipline.
A sensitive episode, it underlines the importance of context in matters of national security communication.
